Wednesday, 7 January 2009

Buzz Words - Tribes

Seth Godin was first to market the book and many of his thoughts inspire this presentation by Graham Brown of mobileYouth.org. Tribes have, however, been around since the days of the woolly mammoth and clubbing each other the head. The marketing angle? Tribes are the cornerstone of Social Utility. Tribes also enable us to build market beachheads and connect with consumers already passionate about our brand and products as opposed to watering down marketing across the mass market.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday, 27 November 2008

Buzz Words - Net Promoter Score

Net Promoter Score was introduced by Fred Reichheld of Bain & Company to promote management with a simple measurement for long term profitability.

Detractions aside, NPS represents a useful, if not simplistic, way to measure what your customers think about your brand.

What do you think of net promoter score? join the conversation with Graham Brown on Twitter

Ask any young customer "would you recommend this brand to a friend?"

For every 100 customer, how many would recommend your brand? That's the essence of NPS.

The results are revealing. Mobile companies consistently rank poorly against more favoured brands (Apple etc) although within mobile net promoter scores,  certain brands (Orange and O2 for example) favour well.

Strengths of NPS:
1) Provides a simple gauge for measuring performance
2) Focuses management on what youth rather than the organization wants (eg social utility)
3) Gears strategy towards trust and loyalty-based tactics

Weaknesses
1) Often seen as too simple
2) Doubts remain as to the connection between long term profitability and NPS values

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , churn

Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday, 13 November 2008

Buzz Words - Social Utility

One of the key benefits of any product aimed at young consumers is Social Utility; how does this product aid my social life?

There are 2 key drivers of consumer behavior and any product needs to fulfil these drivers:
* 1) The need to belong
* 2) The need to be significant

Consider for example Starbucks; it's no coincidence that this popular youth brand hailed from Seattle - the US city with the highest level of inbound migration. What does that mean? It means a large number of displaced young mobile consumers who wanted a social network to plug into - enter Starbucks delivering Social Utility in the form of a) the "third place" as CEO Schulz says and b) a $4 highly visible cup of coffee that not everyone can afford (plus all the nonsense that goes with defining your cup of coffee, "decaff skinny soya whatever").

That's Social Utility.

So consider when you market your product how much more Social Utility does it offer over and beyond what's already out there?

A new perspective


If you start your marketing team meeting with the question - how we can we sell this product? or how can we outsell our nearest rival? then you're on a one way train ride to product obscurity. Understanding social utility first comes from taking a fresh perspective on your product and marketing.

Start with the premise that your consumers don't wake up every morning thinking about your produt and you start to unravel the technology ivory tower.

* When you look at a T-shirt do you see clothing or a statement?
* Is Makeup a fashion item or a reflection of your values and lifestyle?
* Should auto manufacturers make themselves more flash or give parents a reason to feel good about themselves?
* Is Social Media a tech-fest for early adopters or a channel to better deliver Social Utility to youth?

Understand the lifestyle dynamics of the Beachhead whether selling soda to students, cars to youth, sneakers to young office ladies or simply selling bras to young women, you are targeting and design your product and your marketing around delivering better social utility than the whole raft of products they deal with on a daily basis.



Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday, 30 October 2008

Buzz Words - Beachheads

Why are Beachheads important?Beachheads - small groups of tightly defined consumers a brand can use as a springboard to a wider market.

By focusing on share of customer over market share, a brand can engage a consumer niche through value communication, partnership marketing and crowdsourcing.

How does traditional marketing view Beachheads ?
Traditional marketing is about volume and market share - large numbers don't come easily in niche markets. Compare for example Apple's long term attempt to convert PC users to Mac. Didn't happen until, that was, they had built a beachhead with iPod consumers from which they could cross-sell the Mac.

Who gets it?Apple, Google, Nike, Facebook (originally), Myspace, Japanese auto brands (Honda for example)

Who doesn't?

Most mobile operators, Newspapers, Facebook (now)

Key points about Beachheads
* Defined beachheads offer greater marketing density and are therefore more conducive to word of mouth influence, such as with Ethnic groupings.
* Defined beachheads are more profitable than generic markets in undifferentiated markets (eg Banking)
* Beachheads can also form along gender lines.
Resources
* Share of customer vs Market Share (article)

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tuesday, 28 October 2008

Buzz Words - Crowdsourcing

What is crowdsourcing?

by Graham Brown

"Your consumers develop the product"
(see alternative definition on Wikipedia and here)

Why is crowdsourcing important?

In the industrial marketing era, product development and marketing were two distinct domains. PD made the products, marketing sold them and ne'er the twain shall meet.

The problems with this model are:
* slow time-to-market to improve and release new versions of product
* attention is your biggest cost - consumers who dont have a stake in the product are unattentive
* disconnect and ivory tower problem; eg. product development creates a "problem" that marketing needs to solve as opposed to a joint team effort

How does industrial marketing view crowdsourcing ?

Generally crowdsourcing doesn't feature in industrial marketing because getting consumers to innovate would take the raison d'etre away from the product development labs and thus threaten their jobs.

Who gets it?
* Walkers, BMW, Netflix, Toyota, Lego, P&G, Dell, Starbucks, Best Buy, Mountain Dew, Threadless, Zara, Jones Soda, RYZ Wear, FatMuffin, Goosegrade, Unigo, Kideko, VW, Bon Bon Kakku

Who doesn't?

* Everyone else

Key points about Crowdsourcing
* Crowdsourcing can develop legs of its own and grow into a new brand - such as My Starbucks, Best Buy Blue Label, My Jones (Soda) (also here), Mountain Dew's Dewmocracy or Dell Ideastorm. (source)
* Crowdsourcing helps build consumer trust as consumers are more familiar with the products and are in close contact with brand values.
* Crowdsourcing is not only an effective product development tool but can be a highly efficient marketing channel. Walkers drew 800,000 entries in its "Do us a flavour" crowdsourced campaign (source).
* Crowdsourcing doesn't just have to be with consumers. Toyota have been working with their value network for some time under their Kaizen strategy. Employees are a valuable insight into your customer habits. BMW's Virtual Innovation Agency now works with engineers, innovators and entrepreneurs claiming to generate 4,000 ideas a week. As one pundit notes, the key reason for Zara becoming the largest clothing retailer in the world is the insight that salespeople provide about shifting fashion demand
* Crowdsourcing can be specific to a line of area of business - for example "how can we improve our customer recommendations?". Netflix asked this question with a prize  $1 million. Endemol (Bigbrother) are engaged in a similar tactic soliciting new show ideas.
* You can also incentivize consumers by providing a sales kickback. Lego Factory is currently offerin designers a cut of the sales on their crowdsourced product lines.
* Technology companies can draw from valuable insights and a ready-to-go market beachhead of "early adopters" to plug into. Nokia, for example, is currently seeking passionate customers to take an “active role in the development and testing that will help shape Nokia’s next generation of products and services”. Check out their betalabs blog
* Talking about crowdsourcing in your organization is merely rhetoric without fundamental changes to the company, its measurements and the role of marcomms. Customer dialogue needs to be at the heart of decision making as opposed to a useful adjunct to policy.
* Crowdsourcing can happen on different levels - from simple insights to giving the consumer full control. Tapping into the make-it-yourself trend, London-based SomeRightsReserved offers a range of downloadable blueprints for objects that consumers can build, adapt and personalise.
* Clothing and FMCG are particular popular categories. See also RYZ Wear, FatMuffin. Although it can also apply to other areas not often associated with consumer involvement in product development - eg Home Decor (Bon Bon Kakku/Kideko) and marketing colleges (Unigo).
* Crowdsourcing can also be a core part of consumer engagement in content. Goosegrade is a new service that allows blog readers to suggest edits to blogs.
* The first steps into crowdsourcing are neither expensive or daunting. You can for example, simply hang out where your customers hang out (such as using Facebook for crowdsourcing). Kraft tapped into an online community to define and launch its successful South Beach Diet product line without an excessive marketing budget.
* Beware, however, that this is not the holy grail for all market research and there are natural limits to what crowdsourcing can achieve.

Resources
* feel free to suggest

Share/Save/Bookmark

Monday, 27 October 2008

Buzz Words - Trust

by Graham Brown

Why is trust important?
Trust impacts the bottom line because it affects the speed at which the organization communicates.

How does traditional marketing view trust?
Trust is so often relegated to the fuzzy end of organizationalanalytics. In fact, it rarely has any measurable substance at all inmarketing.

Because marketers lionize the characteristics that their CEO is rewarded for achieving - namely ARPU and market share. As long as shareholders and analysts use these metrics as best in class benchmarks we can only ever achieve short term results - poor customer service, low customer loyalty, high churn and high marketing overhead.

Trust is the key underscoring of marketing. Consider for example the comparison below, drawn from Stephen MR Covey's excellent "The Speed of Trust":

High Trust Customers
* High propensity to spread the word (word of mouth)
* Low management costs (don't phone up and complain)
* Self-educate or teach each other
* Open to crowdsource new ideas for your products
* High propensity to try out new products and services (cross selling)
* More forgiving of brand mistakes
* More open to dialogue and profiling

Low Trust Customers

* High propensity to spread negative PR
* High management costs (often complain, cause problems, default)
* Need more education
* Low uptake of new products and services (equals higher marketing costs)
* Unforgiving of brand mistakes
* Wary of dialogue and profiling
* High churn (need sweeteners and discounts to stay on board)

Key points about trust
* it's easy for a trusted brand to abuse its presence and turn consumers against it, if the brand takes its relationship for granted (see this example with Disney)
* bloggers are keen to promote brands they trust (see this example with Google), although large established brands such as Google make some naturally suspicious
* brands can easily abuse trust through overzealous marketing or the abuse of trust by their marketing partners (as in the case of Facebook which is suffering from a decline in widget use for this reason.)
* Some marketers see trust as a form of "friendship". It's a useful analogy but falls flat if it is merely a platitude without action. In many ways considering how you market to consumers in the same vein of communication with your friends is a useful reminder.
* Trust is measurable. See my later notes on the 3 Key Loyalty Metrics: Churn, Lifetime Value and Net Promoter Score.
* Building trust with your market is all about organizational trustworthiness rather than educating the consumer. Here are some useful recommendations.

High & Low Trust Brands

Consider then how the following brand fare in their marketing:
* Apple, Jones Soda, JetBlue, Nike, Nokia, Scion, Honda, Threadless, BBC, Diesel, Google, MySpace
and now compare that with their lesser trusted cousins
* Microsoft, BT, British Gas, Comcast, levis, General Motors, Facebook

Resources

* Vodafone presentation on trust
* Focus on trust not technology
* On the street video interviews of youth and trust
* Telenor Djuice presentation on trust

Share/Save/Bookmark